Weather Closure Open or Close Alert Message
Close

Due to the expected winter storm, the University will close campus beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Sunday. The campus will remain closed through Monday, and we expect to resume normal operations on Tuesday morning. If conditions change, we will share updates promptly. 

Campus Services During the Closure 

While most in-person activities will pause, essential services will remain available. Public Safety and Facilities will be on campus throughout the storm, and the following services are expected to remain open or staffed: 

  • Residence Halls (RDs/RAs on duty) 
  • Dining 
  • Computer Labs 
  • Facilities/Housekeeping 
  • University Operator 
  • Health Services (TBD by Director) 

Students living on campus should expect regular support from Residence Life and Public Safety. 

Classes and Work During the Closure 

Students 
Scheduled face-to-face classes will not take place on campus. At the discretion of faculty, some in-person classes may be held remotely. Faculty will communicate directly, so please check your email and course site for updates. 

Classes that are already scheduled to be fully remote will continue as usual unless otherwise communicated by your instructor.  

Staff 
Staff who are able to work remotely should coordinate with their supervisors as appropriate. 

Staying Informed 

The University’s Inclement Weather Policy is available on the WNE website via the homepage banner. We will communicate any changes or reopening details through WNE Alert, email, and the University website.

 

Students in science lab

MS in ABA Publications

Publications Based on MS in Applied Behavior Analysis Theses

  1. Carey, M. K., & Bourret, J. C. (2014). Effects of data sampling on graphical depictions of learning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(4), 749-764. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.153
  2. Pauwels, A. A., Ahearn, W. H., & Cohen, S. J. (2015). Recombinative generalization of tacts through matrix training with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 200-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0038-y
  3. Verriden, A. L. and Roscoe, E. M. (2016), A comparison of preference-assessment methods. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,49, 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.302
  4. Livingston, C. E., & Graff, R. B. (2018). Further evaluation of the use of preference categories to identify novel reinforcers: A systematic replication. Behavioral Interventions, 33, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1519
  5. Berkman, S. J., Roscoe, E. M., & Bourret, J. C. (2019). Comparing self‐directed methods for training staff to create graphs using Graphpad Prism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(1), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.522
  6. Castelluccio, N. T., & Johnson, C. (2019). Using stimulus preference assessments to identify preferred break environments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52, 772-787. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.567
  7. Fleck, C.R., Bourret, J. C., & Lloveras, L. A. (2019). Increasing meal consumption in individuals with competing protective equipment. Behavioral Interventions 34, 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1681
  8. Szalwinski, J., Thomason‐Sassi, J. L., Moore, E., & McConnell, K. (2019). Effects of decreasing intersession interval duration on graduated exposure treatment during simulated routine dental care. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(4), 944-955. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.642
  9. Bonfonte, S. A., Bourret, J. C., & Lloveras, L. A. (2020). Comparing the reinforcing efficacy of tokens and primary reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 1593-1605. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.675
  10. Gauthier, K. A., Ahearn, W. H., & Colón, C. L. (2020). Further evaluation of treatment integrity for response interruption and redirection. Behavioral Interventions, 35(4), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1738
  11. Glodowski, K. R., Bourret, J., Ivy, J. W., Seaver, J. P., Jackson, J., Stine, J. M. & Nuzzolilli, A. E. (2020). A comparison of token and tandem schedules of reinforcement on response patterns for adolescents with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 35, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1704
  12. Hedquist, C. B., & Roscoe, E. M. (2020). A comparison of differential reinforcement procedures for treating automatically reinforced behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.561 
  13. Lloveras, L. A., Call, N. A., Bourret, J. C., & Slocum, S. K. (2020). Evaluation of a concurrent-operant demand assessment to determine task preference. Behavioral Interventions, 35, 508-523. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1737
  14. Rogalski, J.P., Roscoe, E. M., Fredericks, D. W., & Mezhoudi, N. (2020). Negative reinforcer magnitude manipulations for treating escape-maintained problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 1514-1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.683
  15. Wiggins, H.C., & Roscoe, E. M. (2020). Evaluation of an indirect assessment for identifying tasks for functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 997-1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.656
  16. Stuesser, H. A., & Roscoe, E. M. (2020). An evaluation of differential reinforcement with stimulus fading as an intervention for medical adherence. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 1606-1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.685
  17. Butler, C., & Graff, R. B. (2021). Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54, 684-699. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.807
  18. Griffith, L. S., Roscoe, E. M., & Cornaglia, R. B. (2021). A comparison of brief and extended session duration functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(3), 1001-1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.820
  19. Looi, I. & Johnson, C. (2022). Examining the effects of behavioral skills training on social praise delivery in Malaysian classrooms. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 25(2), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.9782/JISNE-D-20-00055
  20. Roscoe, E. M., Hall, V. A., McVarish, A. E., & Cornaglia, R. B. (2024). Increasing leisure‐item engagement in individuals with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 39(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1981
  21. Rosenzweig, J. L., Li Volsi, C. A., de Man, T., & Ahearn, W. H. (2024). Examining Procedural Variations of Delivering Competing Stimuli in the Treatment of Stereotypy. Behavior Modification, 48(4), 420-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455241232
  22. Yarzebski, V., & Dickson, C. (2024). Teaching Caregivers to Use Graduated Guidance Using Video Modeling. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17(4), 1198-1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00969-3
  23. Zuchora, A., & Dickson, C. A. (2025). Measuring electrodermal activity in the context of shifting reinforcement contingencies. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 36, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DZNG3
  24. Briere, M. L., Janetzke, S., Fleck, C. R., & Bourret, J. C. (2025) Differential reinforcement and stimulus fading without escape extinction to teach cooperation with nasal swab tests. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.70000