Moot Court Competition Teams

The Western New England University School of Law Trial Team holds tryouts early in the fall semester. Four students are chosen for one competing team that enters the American Association for Justice (AAJ) Student Trial Advocacy Competition. There is no writing component to the competition. Tryouts and the competition consist of mock jury trials, including opening statements, direct and cross examinations of witnesses, and closing arguments. More information about the Student Advocacy Trial Competition can be found on the American Association for Justice website.

Coach: John Stewart - Attorney Stewart is an alum of Western New England University School of Law and a local Springfield attorney who has practiced litigation for over 35 years.

To Qualify: Must be a full-time 2L or part-time 3L.

Commitment: Two years – the first year you will assist the team in preparing for the competition; the second year you will select the new members and compete in the competition

Course Credit: First year you will receive 2 credits in the spring semester which satisfies 2 experiential learning credits. Second year, as a competing member, you will receive 1 credit in the fall semester and 2 credits in the spring semester which satisfies 3 experiential learning credits.

Grading: Pass/Fail

The law school sponsors a number of appellate moot court teams each year. These teams have included:

• Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
• First Amendment Moot Court Competition
• National Moot Court Competition
• August A. Rendigs, Jr. National Products Liability Moot Court Competition
• The Jeffrey G. Miller National Environmental Moot Court Competition

Each of these competitions requires writing an appellate brief and then traveling to the competition and engaging in a series of competitive oral arguments. Our teams have performed extremely well in these competitions, winning awards for best oral advocate and best brief as well as national championships. 
  
Questions about the individual moot court teams may be addressed to one of the appellate team faculty advisors:  

First Amendment: Professor Lantagne

National Moot Court: Professor Scoles

Rendigs Products Liability: Professor Steiner

National Environmental Moot Court: Professor Steiner

National Veterans Law Moot Court: Professor Statchen

Selected students participate in the ABA Negotiation Competition which simulates legal negotiations in which law students, acting as lawyers, negotiate a series of legal and factual problems against another team of students. The simulations consist of a common set of facts known by all participants and confidential information known only to the participants representing a particular side. All of the simulations deal with the same general area of the law, but the negotiation situation varies with each round and level of the competition.

An alternative to traditional moot court competitions, the Law Student ABA Tax Challenge asks two-person teams of students to solve a cutting-edge and complex business problem that might arise in everyday tax practice. Students interested in enrolling in the ABA Tax Challenge are required to enroll concurrently in the Federal Income Tax Simulation course.

For more information, please contact:

Professor Fred Royal at froyal@law.wne.edu or 413-782-1422.

First organized in 2009, the National Veterans Law Moot Court Competition (NVLMCC) is sponsored annually by the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC), the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Bar Association, and the George Washington University Law School (GW Law). The NVLMCC is the nation’s premier moot court focusing on veterans law. Hosted close to Veterans Day each fall in Washington, DC, the NVLMCC brings together teams of two students from around the country to argue cutting-edge veterans law issues before panels of distinguished practitioners and judges. The NVLMCC prides itself on the authenticity of the problems and the quality of its judges. The record on appeal and the documents included look like what would be found in a real veterans law case. The judges for the briefs and the oral arguments are drawn from the ranks of experienced veterans law practitioners. In particular, the final round of each NVLMCC is typically presided over by a panel of judges from the CAVC in their courtroom.

For more information, please contact:
Professor Bob Statchen at robert.statchen@law.wne.edu.